Antarctica
Global Warming
-
Full
The effects of Global Warming on Antarctica
|
|
Other versions of this page
|
Easy |
|
|
Global Warming in Antarctica - summary of this page |
The
situation is not so much changing constantly, rather it is being assessed
constantly and changes that may have already occurred (such as the decline
in krill - below) are just being discovered.New
research is being carried out, new things found and understanding is improving.
For the foreseeable future, global warming in Antarctica is likely to be
a fairly lively topic, for the latest news
try here
I wrote these pages after reading an awful lot of articles,
scientific explanations and news reports*,
these statements summarize the situation as I understand at the moment:
*ALWAYS
take news reports in the papers, offline or online with a pinch of salt,
the real purpose of many newspaper stories is very often to sell newspapers
and/or gain some fame or career progression for the journalist.
 | Global warming is real, it is happening
more quickly in some parts of the world than others. |
|
 | The Antarctic Peninsula is particularly
sensitive to small rises in the annual average temperature,
this has increased about 2.5°C in the region in the last 50
years, this is 2 or 3 times faster than the average in the rest
of the world. This makes it an excellent study area. |
|
 | The temperature of the rest of Antarctica
- the other 96% - shows no current indications of rising. |
|
 | There is no unusual significant loss of
ice of any kind from the larger 96% of Antarctica that is not
the Peninsula. |
|
 | Rising temperatures cause ice shelves
to break up - as they are floating already this will not affect sea
levels, it may cause the glaciers behind them to speed up
their flow-rate considerably. These glaciers will add
to sea-level rise if they melt. |
|
 | The temperature of Antarctica as a whole
is predicted to rise by a small amount over the next 50 years.
Any increase in the rate of ice melting is expected to be at
least partly offset by increased snowfall as a result of the
warming. |
|
|

Image courtesy NASA
|
1/ What evidence is there from ice shelves? |

Larsen B ice shelf, 17th Feb 2002 |

Larsen B ice shelf, 5th March 2002 (16 days later) |
|
dimensions of photograph area approx. 130
x 160 km (80 x 100 miles) |
|
The break-up of the Larsen B ice shelf
in early 2002. This event has been attributed to the effects of global
warming. That it occurred is beyond dispute and that it is a result of the
warming of the Antarctic Peninsula where it is situated is also beyond dispute.
What remains unclear is whether or not this is a taste of things to come
and an indicator of an Antarctic-wide phenomena or simply a localized result
of the localized warming of the Antarctic Peninsula region alone.
An ice shelf is a thick layer of ice that
is floating on the sea. They are fed from the land by glaciers. Where the
ice leaves the land and starts to float on the sea is a region known as
the "hinge zone" where the ice is particularly chaotic, broken-up and a
nightmare to try and travel over. Ice shelves surround much of Antarctica.
The Larsen B ice shelf was about 220m thick
(720 feet) and during a 35 day period in early 2002 lost about 3,250 km2
of ice into the ocean. It is thought to have been in existence for
at least 400 years prior to this and probably as long as 12,000 years since
the end of the last ice age.
Such a disintegration in such a short time
period is therefore an extremely significant event. What now remains of
the Larsen B is about 40% of what was there in 1995. It had been breaking
up at what was considered to be a rapid rate anyway before this major event.
The break-up is thought to be a consequence of higher temperatures and large
amounts of summer melt-water running down crevasses in the ice shelf so
speeding the disintegration process.
Overall in the Antarctic Peninsula, seven
ice shelves have between them declined in area by about 13,500 km2
since 1974.
A more recently seen phenomena that follows
this ice shelf collapse is that the glaciers that fed the ice shelf seem
to now be speeding up their flow down to the sea. This will certainly
deposit more water in the oceans, and as this was previously on the land
it will add to an increase in sea-level. The Antarctic peninsula doesn't
have enough ice to make much of a difference to sea level in itself even
if it were all to melt, but it is best seen as an indicator region that
can be observed to enhance understandings of the mechanisms in other parts
of the world.
|
Evidence from seabed sediments in the Prince
Gustav Channel on the Antarctic Peninsula after the ice shelf that previously
blocked it collapsed has shown that it had disappeared at least once before
in the last 10,000 years.
"Thus, the present loss of
ice shelves cannot be assumed to be a consequence of
Man-made climate change, unless and until a cause can be
identified"
British Antarctic
Survey

Ice-Free, Prince Gustav Channel as it is today.
Photographic Print |

A photograph that may not be able to be taken again for a few
hundreds or even thousands of years. In 1985, HMS Endurance
is moored up to the ice barrier that blocked the Prince
Gustav channel between James Ross Island and the Antarctic Peninsula.
Standing by the ship and looking to the left in the picture,
the ice slope could be seen to rise to well over 100 feet (30m)
altitude into the distance (and 9 to 10 times that thickness
under the level of the sea). Today, the whole lot has gone. |
|
|
2/ Is the whole of Antarctica warming? |
| The short answer
is no.
The
Antarctic Peninsula, particularly the West coast of the Peninsula is warming
at a rate 2 or 3 times faster than the global average. This has received
a great deal of publicity in recent years and of course is where the Larsen
B ice shelf (see above) is situated. The average annual temperature of this
region has increased about 2.5°C in the last 50 years.
However, data on temperatures in Antarctica only really
go back about 50 years, anything beyond that is surmised from ice cores
or other sources and so we don't really know how the temperatures vary over
even the medium term in Antarctica.
The Antarctic Peninsula also represents only about 4%
of the whole continent, the other 96% appears to have had a stable temperature
over the last 40 years to the extent where the most remarkable aspect is
the stability compared to other parts of the world.
One reason that the Peninsula region appears
to be so dramatically warming is that it has a large amount of snow and
ice, glaciers, ice shelves and other features but has an annual average
temperature not far off the freezing point of water. A small increase
in the average annual temperature can mean that a few more weeks or even
just a few more days per year when melting can occur can result in very
visible results of ice features reducing or disappearing.
The vast majority of Antarctica is so cold that even if
the temperature was to rise by the same amount as the Peninsula, there still
wouldn't be any melting going on at all. The average surface temperature
of continental Antarctica is about -37°C as opposed to -5°C for the warmest
places on the peninsula.
A warm day in much of Antarctica still gives a temperature
well below freezing, the result = nothing much to see.
A warm day in the Peninsula could well take temperatures
above freezing point at which the ice begins to melt, the result = lots
of melting and potential ice break up.
This is no reason to become complacent however as part
of the reason that the Antarctic ice sheet is so cold is that it's so high,
due to the thickness of the ice. The melting and flow of the glaciers removing
ice from the continent is also slowed by the ice shelves around the continent
edge.
Small rises in temperature that start to nibble away a
little faster at the edges could eventually speed up the loss of ice and
cause greater temperature rises to take place further inland. Ice shelves
seem to act as "corks" in the Antarctic "ice-bottle", remove the ice shelf
and a huge amount of ice from the interior could start to flow towards the
sea where it will melt even though the temperature in the interior may be
stable.
The problem with trying to predict the future in these
matters is that firstly there is not enough data available to base predictions
on and secondly, the way things work is not fully understood. Most models
from different researchers and teams tend to agree however that there will
be some small changes in temperature over the next 50 years. It is also
expected that the rise in global temperature will put more moisture into
the atmosphere and more of this will reach Antarctica so giving a greater
snowfall to offset the melting ice. Despite all the snow and ice there Antarctica
is actually classed as a desert as there is so little snow-fall, it's just
that what does fall - stays there.
|
|
3/ Are there any biological effects of global warming |
Antarctica's
only two flowering plant species that grow only on the Peninsula have spread
considerably in the last few decades in both geographic distribution
and also abundance in the areas where they are found. In some areas they
are becoming the dominant species.
Adélie penguins (Pygoscelis
adeliae) have also been suffering a steady decline in parts of the
Antarctic Peninsula region for the last 20 years. Adélies are reducing
in number and abandoning certain nesting sites while Chinstrap penguins
(Pygoscelis antarctica) are taking their place. Adélies require pack
ice for most of the year and feed
almost exclusively on Krill, Chinstrap penguins will eat a wider variety
of foods and prefer open water. The sea ice has declined over the last 20
years with the rise in temperature in the Peninsula region. Gentoo penguins
(Pygoscelis papua) have also started to nest on the Peninsula in
recent years, for the first time in living memory ( and it needs to be noted
that any memory of Antarctica doesn't stretch much beyond only a
hundred years).
Studies of the bones and remains found
in abandoned colonies indicates that prior to 1950, no Gentoo penguins nested
in these sites at all.
Krill shortages
Studies (November 2004) have shown that stocks
of krill in Antarctica have declined dramatically in recent years. The reason
for this is likely to be a fall in the amount of sea ice in the winter months
particularly in the Antarctic Peninsula region.
Krill numbers may have dropped by as much
as 80% since the 1970's - so today's stocks are a mere 1/5th of what they
were only 30 years ago. The decline in krill may in turn account
for the decline in the numbers of some penguin species.
Dr Angus Atkinson from British Antarctic
Survey, says:
"This is the first time
that we have understood the full scale of this decline. Krill feed on
the algae found under the surface of the sea-ice, which acts as a kind
of 'nursery'.
The Antarctic Peninsula,
a key breeding ground for the krill, is one of the places in the world
where there has been the greatest rise in temperatures due to global
warming. This region has warmed by 2.5°C in the last 50 years (much
more than the mean global rate), with a striking consequential decrease
in winter sea-ice cover.
"We don't fully understand
how the loss of sea-ice here is connected to the warming, but we believe
that it could be behind the decline in krill."
There are commercial implications as well
as scientific ones. The Southern Ocean is a valuable fisheries resource,
many of the species caught feed on krill. Thousands of tourists are also
attracted to Antarctica to enjoy the spectacular wildlife, most of which
feed on krill.
There has been previous speculation that
krill stocks might have decreased, based on smaller more localized surveys
over shorter time periods. This new finding comes from data from nine
countries working in Antarctica who pooled their separate data covering
40 Antarctic summers, in the period between 1926 and 2003. This is the
first time such a large-scale view of change across the Southern Ocean has
been seen.
Another animal that feeds on the same phytoplankton food as krill, jelly-like
colonial animals called salps that drift in the ocean currents have increased
in the same time the krill have decreased.
This decline in krill will also make it more difficult for the great baleen
whales to return to pre-exploitation levels following their decimation in
numbers during the years from approximately 1925-1975.
Climate Change:
Global
Warming |
GW Antarctica |
Misconceptions |
Carbon
sinks | Carbon cycle |
Prevention |
Carbon Offsetting |
Tree Planting
|
| |
|