|
Antarctica Pictures | Antarctica Cruise | Facts | History | Cold Weather Boots | Store | Clothes | Whales | Books | Video | Schools | Site Map | FIDS / OAE's |
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Should Sea Shepherd be taking such drastic direct action against the whaling fleet? | |||
| Yes - Direct action is the only thing that works, everything else is hot air |
|
5 | 83.33% |
| Yes - Direct action is useful, but needs to be restrained in case it damages the cause |
|
1 | 16.67% |
| No - direct action should never be used |
|
0 | 0% |
| Voters: 6. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Should Sea Shepherd be taking such direct action against the Japanese whaling fleet?
http://www.canada.com/nationalpost/s...4206da&k=94068 Meanwhile the Japanese host a meeting hoping to bring a resumption of commercial whaling: http://www.boston.com/news/world/asia/articles/2007/02/13/whaling_activists_withdraw_threat_to_ram_japan_fle et/ On Monday (12th Feb 2007) - "The two sides blamed each other for the clash at sea, which holed a Sea Shepherd Conservation Society ship, the Robert Hunter, but not badly enough for it to abandon the chase." |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|