Cool Antarctica header
Pictures of Antarctica

Antarctica Pictures | Antarctica Cruise | Facts | History | Cold Weather Boots | Store | Clothes | Whales | Books | Video | Schools | Site Map | FIDS / OAE's


Go Back   CoolAntarctica Community Forum > General Topics and Discussions > Lounge
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 8th December 2006, 04:31 AM
ComputerGhost ComputerGhost is offline
Rookie Explorer
Newbie
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 2
Send a message via ICQ to ComputerGhost Send a message via MSN to ComputerGhost
Default Why is there less information about Marie Byrd Land?

I saw a map of bases in Antarctica the other day, and there was only one part I noticed that had very few. Marie Byrd Land had only one base (and it closed in 1972 according to Wikipedia). I did a google search and found that there is very little information on Marie Byrd Land other than a little about the geology.

What exactly is there other than a lot of mountains and volcanoes? Why are there no bases there? Is there anything interesting in Marie Byrd Land? Is there any research being done there?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 8th December 2006, 09:36 AM
Paul Ward's Avatar
Paul Ward Paul Ward is offline
Icemaster
Ice Master
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Cambridgeshire UK
Posts: 328
Default Re: Why is there less information about Marie Byrd Land?

Hi ComputerGhost and welcome to the board.

Antarctica is in real terms little explored or researched - even now. It has been mapped and surveyed at the larger level, but it is so big that large areas are rarely if ever visited. Marie Byrd land is the most extreme of those areas.

Bases are built in the most scientifically and cost effective places. This means regions that are easy to reach. It is not thought that there is anything especially unique about Marie Byrd land that would make it worth while establishing bases there in an area that is just so far from anywhere else.

The area to the north is just open Pacific ocean, to reach Marie Byrd land by ship would mean extra travelling time and distance that is currently deemed unnecessary - so it is little explored.

There is an ice-core drilling project in the Eastern region over a period of three years from 2006, this is operated summer only from an encampment rather than a permanent base. Other recent science in the area has been of aerial surveys.

Due to its location, I think it likely that this region will always be one of the least visited parts of Antarctica unless some specific reason arises to change this - that something may be found is of course all the less likely as hardly anyone goes there!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 8th December 2006, 06:37 PM
ComputerGhost ComputerGhost is offline
Rookie Explorer
Newbie
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 2
Send a message via ICQ to ComputerGhost Send a message via MSN to ComputerGhost
Default That does make sense.

I'm afriad I never even thought of cost or remoteness as being matters considered when building a new station.

The places that we know the least about usually end up being the most interesting. Maybe something interesting will turn up there, maybe not. Unfortunately, as you said, "that something may be found is of course all the less likely as hardly anyone goes there!"

Thanks for the response.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:50 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright this bulletin board contents 2001 - 2013 Paul Ward / CoolAntarctica.com