Another typical skeptic post.
Lots of very definite statements with no evidence to substantiate them.
Most scientists including myself, do believe that the Earth?s Orbit, Axis Tilt, Plate Tectonics, and the Sun Spot Activity Cycles are the Major Factors affecting the Earth?s Albedo Effect, Sea Ice, Glacial Volume, Ocean Salinity, and the Majority of our Planets Climate Patterns. Human or Anthropogenic contributions of Co2 into our atmosphere by our consumption of Fossil fuels has no significant impact upon the Earth?s Climate. Anthropogenic Co2 production and its affect upon Global Warming are as significant as The Low 1.6 Gallon Consumption Toilets. Also Fossil fuel use as a source of Energy is only a temporary phase, as future Energy Sources as history has proven will be discovered and developed.
What utter rubbish! Since when did you speak for "Most scientists" - the fact being that "Most scientists" do NOT think what you said. Or do you discount those who disagree in the same way you discount the IPCC? Therefore you end up meaning "most who agree with me, disagree with what I disagree with, and the rest can't be trusted" - typical skeptic rhetoric.
Yawn! - so Anthropogenic Global warming is all a scam to make money? This coming at a time of highest ever oil prices? - no money at all to be made maintaining the sataus quo eh? China opening a new coal fired power station every week to drive their mammoth economy. Meanwhile the greenies are making a fortune out of windmills and recycling plastic bags? Do you really take yourself seriously in this regard?
as the only thing Green about this Movement is the Green $$$$$$$ a Powerful Group of Elitists are Depositing in their Bank Accounts
I am considering locking and archiving this global warming forum as it's becoming a series of skeptics who have no voice in the real world about this repeating the same thing over and over again.
You have nothing new to add here it seems, but enjoy saying it all again anyway.
It seems to always reduce to "If we disregard the evidence for global warming, there is no evidence" - then follows a load of spurious non-proven claims which when the flaws are pointed out are instantly dumped to be replaced by something else - no better, just different - to try and "prove" what they've already decided.
I agree with your point about underfunding of other environmental issues, though global warming dwarfs them in global importance. Seems to make more sense to me to deal with the biggest issues that we can do something about than to focus on relatively minor issues that may be swept away metaphorically and possibly even literally by the effects of global warming.
There is also the fact that there seems to be a lot of sour grapes by scientists who can't get funding for their own pet projects as they are regarded as insufficiently important by the funding suppliers. Easier to blame an external reason than their own short-comings as a scientist. This group seem to be somewhat over-represented amongst the skeptics.
footnote - CometWarpVoyager then followed this up with a personal attack with a whole range of unfounded and irrelevant accusations. I will not allow this board to be reduced to a series of personal battles that occur on other internet forums from time to time. As Global Warming seems to be a particularly emotive issue I am now locking the forum, it can be viewed, but no longer accepts new posts or threads.